Compare: testRigor
AI Testing Platform and testRigor compared
Both tools take tests in plain English and avoid CSS and XPath locators. testRigor accepts free-flowing English and runs tests on its servers; AI Testing Platform uses a step list in YAML and runs locally or in hosted browsers.
testRigor positions itself for QA teams where manual QA can create and maintain automated tests, and its FAQ offers an on-premise option.
AI Testing Platform fits a team that wants tests readable by people who do not write code, a check per test on the pull request, healed steps kept for review, and a triage card for each failure. It is in early access and covers web and API tests.
What both do
- Tests are written in plain English from the user's point of view.
- Tests adapt when an element changes instead of failing on a selector.
- Tests run in CI.
Where the approaches differ
Spec structure
AI Testing Platform: A list of steps in a YAML file; free-form prose without step structure is not accepted.
testRigor: testRigor describes "free flowing plain English" test creation.
Where tests run
AI Testing Platform: Locally through the CLI, or in hosted browsers with --cloud.
testRigor: testRigor states tests run on its servers.
Pricing
AI Testing Platform: Per plan with limits on tests and cloud runs.
testRigor: testRigor's FAQ describes pricing by the number of parallel servers, not users or executions.
Published facts, side by side
| Dimension | AI Testing Platform | testRigor |
|---|---|---|
| Test authoring | Plain-English steps in YAML files in tests/ | Tests are created "using free flowing plain English"; "parsed plain English" lets "anyone" build and read tests "from an end-user's point of view". [1] |
| Maintenance | Locator and layout changes healed and recorded for review; behaviour changes fail and go to triage | Does not use XPath or CSS locators; elements are described "from the end-user's perspective". "AI-based self-healing" and synonym support let a test "look on the screen for the alternative way of doing what was intended" when the specification changes. [2] |
| Execution | CLI runs locally in Chromium; --cloud runs in parallel on hosted browsers, EU or US region | Tests run on testRigor's servers: "We handle everything on our servers." "Runs multiple browsers and devices simultaneously for different sessions"; integrates with infrastructure providers "including LambdaTest, BrowserStack, SauceLabs". [3] [1] |
| Browsers | Chromium, Firefox, WebKit | Web testing on desktop and mobile "across 3,000+ combination of browsers and devices on multiple operating systems". The "Private Complete" plan covers Ubuntu, Windows, Mac, Android, iOS and Windows Native. [1] [4] |
| CI | GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, CircleCI; Jenkins (Beta) | "Integrates with all CI platforms, including Jenkins, CircleCI, Azure DevOps, etc." Provides a pre-populated bash script for Linux-based systems and a PowerShell script for Microsoft systems to paste into a CI/CD pipeline. [1] [3] |
| Export | Playwright (TypeScript) | Not stated in public docs |
| Self-hosting | CLI runs locally; self-hosted runners Planned (roadmap) | FAQ states: "Yes, we can offer an on-premise solution." [3] |
| Pricing model | Per plan: Free $0, Team $390/month, Scale $1,290/month, Enterprise quoted; billing starts at beta | Priced by infrastructure, meaning "the number of servers that run your tests in parallel"; no charge for the number of users or executions. Sign-up page lists three plans: "Free - Public" (tests and results public), "Private" (14-day trial) and "Enterprise" (custom offer); no prices are shown on that page. [5] [4] |
testRigor facts verified on from their public docs and pricing pages. AI Testing Platform column from its declared capability statuses.
Questions
What is a testRigor alternative?
Other tools that accept tests in plain English include AI Testing Platform and Momentic. The table lists testRigor's published facts with links to its own pages.
How is testRigor priced?
testRigor's FAQ says it charges by the number of servers that run tests in parallel. Its sign-up page lists Free - Public, Private and Enterprise plans without prices.
Can the tests live in my repository?
In AI Testing Platform, yes: each test is a YAML file in tests/ in your repository.
Request early access
Early access: prices are the planned list prices. Billing starts when the platform enters beta; early-access use is not charged. We reply within 24 hours on business days.
Found an outdated fact? Write to hello@ai-testing-platform.com.All comparisons