Solutions: Teams shipping with coding agents
For teams shipping with coding agents
When a coding agent writes most of the diff, the human reviewer becomes the slowest step. End-to-end tests in plain English check the flows on every change, and the agent can read the same specs and setup files.
Trigger: Review is the bottleneck. What helps: Verification that runs without a human writing tests.
How the platform fits
A setup a coding agent can follow
The for-agents page, llms.txt and a skill file give an agent the install command, config, spec format and CI step.
Specs a reviewer reads in a minute
A plain-English spec shows the flow being checked without reading test code.
Failures come with a proposed cause
A triage card classifies each failure as an app bug, test issue or environment, as a proposal for a person to confirm.
Capabilities
Tests in plain English
A test is a list of steps in plain English in a YAML file; the platform resolves each step against the live page at run time.
Read moreRuns in CI
One CLI command runs a suite in CI and reports a pass, fail or healed status per test as a check on the pull request.
Read moreTriages failures
A failed test gets a triage card with the failing step, the page state, the diff from the last passing run and a classification: app bug, test issue, environment.
Read moreLearns your productBeta
Builds a map of flows from session recordings, product docs and the codebase to propose tests and resolve ambiguous steps.
Read moreQuestions
Can a coding agent write the specs?
The spec format is plain YAML with plain-English steps, documented in llms.txt and the skill file, so an agent can draft specs for a person to review.
Does the platform learn the product by itself?
Learning the product from recordings, docs and the codebase is in beta. Sources are chosen and connected by the team.
Request early access
Early access: prices are the planned list prices. Billing starts when the platform enters beta; early-access use is not charged. We reply within 24 hours on business days.